14th CSFSR


Civil Society Situation Report #14

‘Critical Situation of shelter in context of delayed Early Recovery Phase’



 


Table of Contents


 

 


 



Data Sources

v  Primary Data

1.    Feedback from PACF on basis of their field visits.
2.    Charter of demands through Consultations at District level of all concerned stakeholders.
3.    Advocacy Meetings with Government Officials and humanitarian partners/clusters
4.    Focus Group Discussions with Community
5.    PDI Humanitarian Complaints mechanism

v  Secondary Data
1.    MSNA Report.
2.    5th TSSU Report.
3.    Current Shelter updates
4.    Situation reports by different humanitarian partners
5.    PDMA/NDMA summaries and reports
6.   Sphere standards, HAP standards and Hyogo Framework for Action.

 


 

Background

v 95% displaced flood affected and decamped peoples out of 796,861 returnees gave top priority to the shelter.
v 796,861 houses in thirteen districts are the caseload of Early Recovery Phase. (468,306 damaged & 328,555 destroyed)
v 59% houses partially damaged and 41% completely unlivable
v 328,555 rain flood affected people are in dire need in thirteen highly flood affected districts of Sindh
v 1.20 million Women and 2.40 million children are with their damaged and destroyed houses.
v Inadequate humanitarian funding for shelter/NFIs (Gap52%) and lees covered relief phase deteriorated situation further.
v 36% (253,661) flood affected population could not avail winterization items and kitchen items
v Recovery projects were to be started from 1st of the January as per Government Plan but yet in process.
v Lack of planning and visible strategy by government on shelter modalities, household level assessment and response for the shelter  
v   Vulnerable households headed by women, elderly, chronic ill, child and suffer most.
v 10% inundation situation
v 241 settlements organized by the flood affected peoples on their own living with 10,379 families and 55,953 individuals

Situation Overview:

Following the 2011 floods and rains in Pakistan, 796,861 houses in Sindh were damaged (59%) or destroyed (41%). In Balochistan approximately 26,000 houses were reported damaged (65%) or destroyed (35%) (Source: Shelter Cluster Damage Comparison endorsed by NDMA). It is assumed that 40% of the total number of affected households (equal to 94% of the households whose house has been totally destroyed) requires ER Shelter Support to reconstruct or strengthen their homes.
As per the “Rapid Technical Assessment of Damage and Needs for Reconstruction in Housing Sector, October 2010, by UN HABITAT, 46% of the houses in Sindh are made of mud, 34% of adobe and 30% of bricks. In 2011 as much as 70% of the damaged or destroyed houses were made of mud which shows the vulnerability of the housing stock in Sindh.
Although 90%1 of the houses in Pakistan are built with the involvement of masons, many of the houses have not survived the disaster. DRR specific assessments have been conducted and the field observations have shown that DRR reinforced structures have survived considerably better than the ones without. However there remains a knowledge or motivation gap regarding what can be achieved in terms of improved housing construction at low cost.
In Sindh it is common practice that houses are extended with the expansion of the family. Usually a dwelling starts with a one-room shelter which will be expanded when resources allow with a veranda and gradually more rooms. The average Sindh family, with 6, 3 persons, lives in a 2 room house with a veranda. The houses are often situated in a fenced compound and connected with houses of first line family members. Recently the government of Pakistan has expressed the ambition to support the affected population in the restoration of their houses and make them more resilient for the future disasters. The houses will adhere to common culture practices by for instance allowing the possibility to compartmentalize the shelter in 2 rooms and accommodate at least preparations for sanitation and cooking facilities. The typical building season in Sindh takes place between January and July, which is in line with the recovery period.
An estimated 5.44 people were initially displaced from their homes by the floods. Many settled in informal and “temporary” settlements (TS) on elevated land and others in formal camps that were established by the government and NGO’s ranging in size from individual families to 12,000 individuals. The multi-sector needs assessment completed at the end of October 2011 showed that the number of persons residing in the remaining 5,000 (estimated) settlements in Sindh, has been reduced to a few temporary settlements.  According to the MSDNA the needs in the TS were significant. 93% of the households indicated that they required blankets, 66% of the TS reported diarrhea, 72% of the TS have no latrines and 75% of the TS have no official camp management structure. The return process is complete as per government contrary to the NGOs figure, in January 2012 it is estimated that there are still around 241 Temporary Settlements with around 10,379 / 55,953 Individuals in Sindh 4(Source: 5th TSSU assessment).
30% of the land in Sindh is owned by landlords and 22% by the state as waters recede, and the immediately support required for temporary settlements decreases, the urgency for the displaced people to find durable solutions increases. Almost 100% the families in the temporary settlement reported in January that their villages were not accessible. A coordinated approach can facilitate this process, speeding up the rate of recovery and thereby saving resources.
Humanitarian funding faced gap of the 52% in Shelter/NFIs against the flash appeal 2011 during emergency relief phase. Lessons learned from the 2010 particularly in shelter/NFIs sector are many but some of them are to be kept in eye before interning in to the sector. It was observed that disaster risk reduction component was not prioritized in some the flood affected areas of northern Sindh.
                                

Households covered during emergency phase 2011

Items
Households reached
Coverage
Plastic Tarpaulins
505,171
64%
Blankets
531,098
36%
Kitchen sets
101,608
14%
Tool kits
17,939
11%
Sleeping Mats and Bedding
136,203
9%

The monsoon during July 2011 to September disrupted the houses built during the recovery phase against the rain flood 2010. There were many services providers served in shelter building of the flood affected peoples but due to with no resilient power built houses could not stand making flood affected peoples more vulnerable.
Shelter cluster was not in collaboration of the wash, education and protection cluster. Community suffered over the eligibility criteria and package. Government and NGOs had different packages and model ties for the shelter and housing in 2010 and comprehensive planning at district level was lacking keeping in view the practical requirements of the flood affected peoples. Beneficiary identification and vulnerability assessment was the key step was missed for the intervention in shelter and housing during flood 2010.
   
During the flood 2010 Government of Sindh intervened in shelter with the program called village rehabilitation program. District governments at that time identified and referred villages for the rehabilitation. Only forty villages were selected for village model system.   
     

Current Situation:


768,457 flood peoples found their houses lost or damaged as estimated by Provincial disaster management authority during the emergency phase from September to December 2011. Currently 100% evacuation of the flood affected peoples has been reported by the PDMA from the established camps. Reports critically highlighted the issues and problems faced by the flood affected peoples in camps. It was reported that more than 60% families were living in unplanned locations and74% without formal camp management structure. 95% (121,123) of the families in temporary settlements indicated that their homes were damaged or destroyed. This was more than was identified in community assessment (58%).  With regard to the safety and protection of the women and children in camp life the situation was not as per requirement. It was reported by the UNOCHA in MSNA report that 74% (94,348) families suffered protection issues.
As per MSNA report 35% rain flood affected areas also witnessed losses in flood 2010 and heavy rain caused partially or fully losses and damages to every corner of the Sindh but eight districts have suffered recorded damages and losses in almost every sector. Relief phase was to be started from 1st of the January to the September 2012 but displaced and flood affected peoples are observing the nonintervention of any kind against the ERF making people further vulnerable. It is arguable to believe that government would be able to rehabilitee the peoples within the seven months of this year.

District Wise Shelter Damages Status

S#
District
Partially Affected
Fully Affected
Total
1
Badin
60367
40764
101131
2
Mirpurkhas
59790
62187
121977
3
Shaheed Benazirabad
43538
22652
66190
4
Tando Allahyar
15701
10603
26304
5
Tando Muhammad Khan
25000
15000
40000
6
Tharparkar
31808
33083
64891
7
Umerkot
50071
52079
102150
8
Sanghar
38120
39648
77768
Total
324395
276016
600411
It does not take great efforts to understand that those who lost their homes (328,555 families) completely due to the heavy rain could not build their home keeping in view the income and assets losses flood affected peoples underwent. 40 percent of households reported that their main economic activity has been discontinued. An additional 48 percent reported that their economic activities were disrupted by the flood. On average a household lost 202,550 rupees in income (not taking into account asset losses). This adds up to a total estimated financial income loss between one trillion to 1.2 trillion rupees. A total number of households facing severe food insecurity are estimated at 2.5 million people of whom almost half a million are facing hunger.

Flood affected peoples suffered badly in their income generation sources as agriculture; livestock and labor market whereas 71% were living in their mud houses with feeble economic conditions to respond any disaster. The picture of the households’ composition of flood affected peoples unfolds the 6.35% female headed households and 8.57 elderly and chronically ill household head. The slow situation of the water recession and two months delayed recovery phase has further worsened the living conditions of the flood affected peoples in rebuilding their houses, schools, hospitals and basic infrastructure. Flood affected peoples are terribly seeking for the cash for work so that they can sustain their livelihoods and basic infrastructure.           

Situation is critical with regard to the shelter and housing of rain affected peoples in Sindh. Provincial Disaster management authority claims 100% evacuation of flood affected peoples from camps but field reports suggest that yet thousands of the peoples have managed themselves in spontaneous camps to their areas of origin. Flood affected peoples are living with road sides for the relief services due to the nonintervention of residual relief services to the areas of the origin. As per 5th TSSU report 241 number of the settlements are lived by more than ten thousands families and 55,953 individuals.      



Flood affected Peoples are generally suffering in health, Wash, education, food security and livelihoods sectors. As per report 46% health facilities damaged and 60% schools. 612,132 numbers of children are deprived of access to education. 70% Staple food crops were lost whereas 424,366 families lost livestock and 164,881 families sold livestock. Due to the damages in physical infrastructure and housing 52% families lost latrines to their returned areas.

Economically Situation is very feeble of flood affected peoples and income generation sources are very much starched in flood affected areas of the Sindh. 80% flood affected people, depended economically on agriculture and livestock which damaged badly. The loss of trillions of the assets and income of the flood affected peoples minimized greatly their economic potential to be self reliant. The construction and repair of the collapsed and damaged houses consume money at least from one to three lacks. Flood affected situation remains none intervened due to the two months delayed early recovery phase.
Slow water recession process and yet 10% inundation situation hampered flood affected peoples to sustain their lives. Lack of the recovery and developments projects decreased the economic opportunity for the flood affected peoples.
Since more than one and half months have passed, revised appeal for early recovery phase has not been processed for humanitarian funding. The decision of the Government to initiate the early recovery phase from 1st of the January 2012 did not come true. The decision of the end of the relief services and evacuation of the relief camps deteriorated situation further for flood affected victims. Currently flood affected people are living without relief and recovery services in Sindh.                               

Recommendations:


v  Government should start early recovery framework in flood affected areas as soon as possible.
v  DRR component should be involved in shelter strategy to improve the resilience of the houses  keeping in view the upcoming prediction of the heavy monsoon in July and September 2012.
v  Community participation through shelter committees should be encouraged to reflect the ownership and community customary needs for sustainability.
v  Collaboration with wash, education and protection shelters with shelter cluster should be promoted further for the comprehensive planning and response to building shelter.
v  Government should prioritize shelter with model village concept so that wash, community mobilization, health and education needs of the flood affected villages can be addressed.
v  Government should prioritize most vulnerable as female headed households, choric poor and ill, and elderly to respond effectively.
v  Government should provide temporary shelter to the uncovered needy flood affected families till the start of the early recovery framework. 

No comments: